Would you still come if I stopped posting altogether?
As you may have gathered, I’ve had the big job interview I mentioned a few days ago. I think I did quite well, but I don’t find out about the job for at least another week because they have other people to interview.
Meanwhile, my number of hits seems to have stayed roughly the same even though I’ve been posting much less frequently. I’m not sure what to make of this! (Of course, about half my hits are Googlers these days. Not that the Googlers aren’t welcome.)
***
Anyway, Scott asked for the views of gay people on Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, so as an official gay person I would have to say that I think you are taking this all a bit too seriously mate! In any case I’m all in favour of “tacky co-opting.” I have to say I don’t get the “stereotypes” criticism though. Firstly, the show is made by gay people; I don’t think anybody (including other gay people) should be telling us we can’t play up to our own stereotypes a bit if we want to. Secondly, there is actually quite a spectrum of campness on the show, ranging from Carson at the flaming end to Thom and Ted who are almost straight acting! The fab five could easily be a random group of five gay men of my acquiantance…what’s the problem, are we going to start pretending that lots of gay men aren’t fashion people or interior designers or whatever?
The slightly embarrassing thing of course is that lots of gay men I know, myself included, could benefit from the ministrations of the fab five themselves. If anything the problem is the way that straight men are stereotyped! (In fact I know quite a few straight men who are neater and more stylish than me, not that it takes much.) So by all means bring on queer eye for the queer guy or straight eye for the queer guy or whatever, it’s all good fun!
To be honest, though, when I first heard the description of the show I cringed too. It was only seeing how delightfully and warmly the premise has been realised that changed my mind.