Usable Words

This is the final post in my series on dealing with objections in web content. The first two are here and here.

The story so far: We’ve established that, for any objection that might potentially get in the way of a person’s decision to buy your product and service, there are three broad types of objector: explicit objectors (those who have the objection and will voice it), latent objectors (those who have the objection, at least at some level, but won’t voice it), and non-objectors (those who don’t have the objection at all).

We then went further and divided each of these three categories of objector into a further three subcategories. And we finished the last post by saying that the way to deal with all these different types of objector is not to try to write something that will please everybody. So what do you do instead?

How to deal with multiple types of objector

I could deal with this topic at very great length (well, OK, I could deal with most topics at very great length) but I’m going to boil it down to five steps:

1. Think about the audience for this specific piece of writing.
2. Try to work out approximately what proportion of this audience will fit into each category of objector.
3. Work out how much impact answering the objection will have for each category.
4. Write your copy for the category of objector that looks most important taking both Steps 2 and 3 into account.
5. If you get the chance to address other categories implicitly, go for it.

So let’s take each of these in turn. read more >

As promised, a follow-up to my first post on objections. This is the post where I start to get pointy-headed. I have to warn you that not only will I divide people into three categories, I’ll also divide each of these three categories into three subcategories!

But as long you can deal with that much taxonomy before breakfast, this post should give you a more nuanced way of working out how different groups of customer might relate to a potential objection. And there will be donuts.

I’ll also briefly talk about how to deal with these different kinds of objector. But this will be mostly theory: the applied stuff will come in the final post in the series. (Yes, it’s a trilogy!) read more >

One of the things good web copy does is answer objections – the niggling blockages people have that prevent them from buying what you’re selling. According to marketing guru Sonia Simone, “FAQs” should really be called “FROs” – Frequently Raised Objections.

So when you’re developing web content, you should certainly try to anticipate objections your potential customers might have. But here’s something that might sound a bit odd: you shouldn’t answer every single potential objection! Let me give you a (rather gross) example to show why not.
read more >